Tag Archives: word retrieval

Word Retrieval and The Spacing Effect

https://fs.blog/2018/12/spacing-effect/

My husband sent me a fabulous link today from Farnam Street.  This website is  going to be my new go-to for interesting articles about anything and everything.  It’s not a speech path newsletter and not a word finding blog.  As touted on the website, it’s “brain food.”  Here’s the link:  https://fs.blog/newsletter/    So what does this have to do with word finding?  

Today’s article was entitled, “The Spacing Effect:  How to Improve Learning and Maximize Retention.”  It cited scientific evidence that we learn best when we utilize “the spacing effect.”  In short, if we break information into smaller bits and review it in a scheduled manner we will be able to recall it better: AKA promote retrieval.  As speech-language pathologists we see this daily in the kids we have in therapy.  Teach a little, review, and return to the material later.  Teach a little more, review with an increasingly greater interval, and return to the material again.  It’s a great post.  I encourage you to read the entire article.     https://fs.blog/2018/12/spacing-effect/ 

Now if we could only convince our students to use this strategy in their studies!  Consider subscribing to the blog – it’s truly worthwhile!    

Helping preschoolers with word finding difficulties

school-readiness-for-preschool

Preschoolers with word retrieval difficulties are tricky.  We need to be sure theirs is not a deficit in vocabulary or a phonological disorder that makes them difficult to understand.  Sometimes I have worked with preschoolers in language therapy for a while before I realized their underlying difficulty was actually word finding.

Please read my posts of October 14, 20 and 21, 2014, about identifying word retrieval problems.  Some preschoolers do not respond well to formal testing, and it’s very important to look at their use of language in a natural environment.  One of the most helpful strategies for preschoolers is to offer a choice of 3 or 4 responses and ask them to choose the correct one:  “Are you telling me about your elbow, your shoulder, or your ankle?” or “Would you like the purple, the orange, or the yellow marker?”

Remember that a failure to respond does not necessarily mean the child does not know the answer.  Give him extra time, and provide advance warning if possible.   “I’ll ask you to tell me what your favorite project was yesterday.  You can share about making a snowman, drawing a caterpillar, or sharing a snack.  Be thinking about what you’d like to tell your friends.”

Encourage gestures and actions.

“Can you tell me another way?”

Establish a signal or a key phrase for the child to let you know he needs some more “thinking time.”

For some children, providing the beginning sound (not beginning letter) is helpful.  This is generally more helpful with older children, but some preschoolers are aided by this prompt.  I suspect it is related to their phonological development, but I truly don’t know.

Any activities you are currently using for language development are helpful for kids with word finding problems.  Develop vocabulary, categories, and associations among different words.  Expand their “safety net” of a rich language base. Most important, have fun!  A happy, engaged child is ready to learn.

 

 

 

Describing

How can we make our word finders better “describers”?  I like to use the Expanding Expression Tool, or EET. Many thanks to Sara at Expanding Expression.com for her permission to talk about the tool.

eet strand

The EET is a great tool for promoting a variety of expressive language goals.  According to expandingexpression.com, it promotes a variety of oral and written language skills, including vocabulary comprehension, defining and describing, making associations, stating functions, categorization, and similarities and differences.  That almost sounds like a list of different word finding strategies a child can use, doesn’t it?  And it’s multi-sensory!

I modify the program a bit to promote word retrieval.  When a child is stuck on a word, how can he describe it to his listener so his listener knows what word he is searching for?  What are an object’s “salient characteristics”?  In other words, what makes it what it is?  I remind my students that it will not help their friends know they are talking about a “chair,” if they describe it as “blue.”   It is often most helpful to name the category  (furniture) and 2 or 3 important details (one person sits on it, it has a seat and 4 legs).  The EET uses a green bead to represent “group,” or the category.  Each bead reminds a child to provide different information about the object he is describing.  Green:  group, blue: do (“what does it do?” or “what do we do with it?”), and so on.  It wouldn’t be fair to say  too much about the program; I would rather you learn more about it and purchase it from Expanding Expression.

Sometimes  I use the tool as a game.  The object is to use such amazing descriptions that your “opponent” identifies the described mystery object with as few hints as possible.  Anytime I call the activity a “game” and add some competition, the kids are more motivated.

When I first introduced this tool to my students, I received a voicemail from one of my “speech parents.”  She explained that the EET was used throughout the school where she taught, and sang to me the song they used to teach the mantra!  To the tune of “Skip to My Lou,” they sang “green, group, blue, do, what does it look like? what is it made of?”, etc. etc..   I immediately taught it to my speech kids, and I still use the song to help myself remember the meaning of each of the beads.  I also make mini-tools using plastic beads from a craft store.  Each student gets one to use as a bookmark or a backpack “charm.”

It’s important to remember that once a child does come up with the word, he should anchor it in his repertoire to make it easier to retrieve the next time.  To anchor it, please refer to my post of November 4, citing Diane German’s Word Finding Intervention Program -Second Edition  (German,  2004).

Do you have other ideas for promoting a child’s “describing” skills?  Please “comment” at the bottom of this post or send me an email!  I would love to hear your success stories!

Picture It

0413_lifestyle_messydesk_630x420

 

Sometimes  children with word finding difficulties need help visualizing the context of the words they need.   I find that  kids can sometimes retrieve the word for which they are searching when I help them “picture it.”  On November 2, I posted the acronym “Silly Sally Always Draws Fuzzy Pandas” created by my colleagues Sarah Mendoza and Tara Brooks.  The “P” in Pets stands for “picture it.” In FAVOR-C, the “V” stands for Visualize.  Either acronym can help students remember to try a variety of strategies when they get stuck on a word.

“Make a movie in your head.”  “Make your brain be a camera.”  Describe visualizing in words they understand.  These phrases have worked for me.

If my student is having trouble retrieving the word for her after-school snack, I have her visualize her kitchen:  “Walk in the door and put down your backpack.  It’s time for an after-school snack!  Do you see the kitchen table and the cupboards?  Do you see your fridge and the stove?  Look in the  refrigerator – what do you see?  What color is the counter top?  What else do you see?”    If she can’t retrieve the word for that new piece of science equipment, I have her visualize the science lab: “Pretend you are walking to your station.  You can see the microscope, the Petri dish, and your notes.  Tell me what it looks like.”

Of course, it’s important to remember that what Olivia visualizes may be different than what Andrew visualizes.  When asked to visualize her bedroom, Olivia may use words like “pink,” “fluffy” and “stuffed animals.”  Andrew may use words like “camo” “video console” and “Legos.”   I became very aware of seeing a room from different perspectives when I realized that what I visualized when I thought of my office was my cutesy bulletin board and organized bookshelf of therapy materials.  What my students visualized, however, was the room from the opposite side of the table:  my cluttered desk, distracting computer screen, and stained coffee mug.  Ugh! What a lesson in visualizing!

Try “visualizing” as one strategy in your student’s arsenal of strategies.  Always encourage him to think about what helps him “find” the words he needs. Help him become aware of what works for him.  As he becomes more aware, he can be a better self-advocate.

 

 

An endorsement from the word finding guru!

I met today with Dr. Diane German, who has been my mentor in the field of word finding ever since I took her course on the subject.  I call her the word finding guru.  I showed her this blog, my Facebook page, and my Twitter tweets.  She was very enthusiastic about more SLPs, teachers, and parents becoming informed about the impact word finding can have on kids, and how we can help them.   I think that’s one thing that is very special about the field of speech-language pathology – people are always networking to share ideas and best practices.

Meeting with Diane was a reminder we want to help a child get automatic with important vocabulary before he or she needs the words in conversational speech. So now is the time to introduce the Thanksgiving vocabulary and corresponding retrieval strategies needed  so he can comfortably discuss his or her upcoming Thanksgiving activities. Dr. German (2005) in the Word Finding Intervention Program, Second Edition (WFIP-2) presents a 5-step retrieval procedure for improving word finding of target words.

First, select a word that is difficult for the  learner to retrieve.

Second, divide the target word into syllables, reinforcing each syllable of multi-syllable words.   When I do this second step,  I like to have the younger kids move their entire bodies with each syllable.  I borrowed Dr. Judy Montgomery’s technique of “head, shoulders, knees, and toes” which she uses to promote syllable awareness for beginning readers (Montgomery, 2007).  I have the kids stand up, touch their “head, shoulders, knees, and toes” for each syllable in  (e.g.,) cornucopia, Mayflower, or Pilgrim. The kids are always begging for words of 5 or more syllables so they can swat their own rear end!  You can also have them  touch shoulder, elbow, wrist, tap out syllables, clap, or even stomp their feet.  I have had third grade girls act out an impromptu rap dance to reinforce the syllables in “quadrilateral.”   Get them moving and laughing!  Reinforce each syllable with a movement.

Third, according to Dr. German, match same sound mnemonic cues  (words that sound like the target syllable) to the “evasive” (i.e., difficult to retrieve) syllables.  This helps anchor the syllables for automatic retrieval.   Here are some ideas to get you started:

cornucopia – corn/coke or corn/Cody (apparently there is a popular Disney channel show about Zack and Cody)

Pilgrim – pill/grim or pill/Grinch –  draw a picture with a grim-faced Pilgrim wearing a pill for a hat or the Grinch with a pill

feast –  feet – draw a picture of a big platter of feet to eat

The sillier the better. The kids are engaged and start coming up with their own cues.  Remember that what is meaningful to you as an adult may not be meaningful to an eight year old or a junior in high school.  Be alert to the popular culture with which they are familiar.  I confess that I had never heard of Zack and Cody, but my speech kids certainly knew who they were!   Dr. German stresses that it is important to think of the cue as you practice saying the target word out loud.  She recommends mnemonic cues be written in a “think cloud” to reinforce that one only thinks of the mnemonic cues.

Lastly, steps 4 and 5 involve rehearsal. While the learner thinks of his/her mnemonic cues, each target word is rehearsed three times alone and then in a meaningful sentence (German, 2005). When I do these last steps with my students, I modify a bit:  I  ask for a “word finding 5.”  Each student says the word aloud 5 times, makes up a sentence using the word, then he or she gets a “high 5.”

Try to anticipate the vocabulary your students will need in the coming weeks.  Recheck with your classroom teachers and get an update on their curriculum words.  Don’t forget to share your ideas for mnemonic cues by replying to this post or by emailing me: jan@wordfindingforkids.com. I will add your ideas to the vocabulary list on this blog.

References

German, D.J. (2005). Word Finding Intervention Program, Second Edition (WFIP-2), Austin,TX: Pro.ed.

Montgomery, J. K. (2007b). The Bridge of Vocabulary. Minneapolis, MN: Pearson Assessment.

 

 

Strategies for word retrieval

I mentioned last week that phonological mnemonics are powerful aids for word finding.  Pairing “easy words” with “hard words” has been shown to promote word retrieval [source: German, D. J., Schwanke, J. K., & Ravid, R. (2012). Word Finding: Differentiated vocabulary instruction in the speech and language room. Communications Disorders Quarterly, 33(3), 146-156].  You can refer to the drop down vocabulary menu from the blue bar at the top of this page for a list of cues I have used or others have suggested to me.

When you can anticipate the vocabulary a child needs, the mnemonics are my strategy of choice.   But what about those times a child gets stuck on a word he hasn’t practiced?

Screen Shot 2014-11-01 at 2.06.37 PM

A child needs a variety of strategies to help himself come up with target words.  It’s important to match the strategy to his/her individual needs.  I try to watch for those times a child encounters a word finding problem during a therapy session.  As soon as possible, I ask him to tell me how he came up with the target word.  “How did you get there?”  Did he visualize the context of the word he needed? For example, if he was trying to come up with the word “touchdown” did he visualize a football game?  If she was trying to come up with the word “pommel horse” did she visualize her gymnastics studio?  Did he remember the initial sound in the word?  Did she remember the category to which the word belonged?

In my next few posts, I’ll talk about the different strategies I have found successful.  I have used 2 acronyms for these strategies:  The first is FAVOR-C (“Do yourself a favor and see these word finding strategies in your mind”).

F  Fill in the blank

A  Associations

V  Visualize

O   Opposites and synonyms

R   Reflective pause

C   Categories

The second is “Silly Sally Always Draws Fuzzy Pandas.”  Thanks to my colleagues Sarah Mendoza and Tara Brooks Baron for coming up with this cute acronym:

Screen Shot 2014-11-01 at 2.06.37 PM

You will notice the strategies aren’t the same on both lists. You may want to make modifications of your own. Think about  what strategies  the child finds most helpful.  Obviously older kids may be more comfortable with FAVOR-C; younger ones may like “Silly Sally.”  I’ll give some examples of activities I have used with each of these strategies in future posts.

 

More word retrieval in the media..hot off the press!

Word retrieval in the media!! From ESPN today, October 29 – Grantland.com gave a perfect example of a word finding difficulty you can share with your young (or old) sports fans:

The Pirate and His Pupil

After butting heads for two seasons, Mike Leach and Connor Halliday have finally found common ground — and air. Now, the passing records are starting to fall.

There’s a word that Mike Leach is trying to conjure from somewhere deep within the bedraggled utility closet of his mind, and this word is escaping him, just as the context of this particular digression has escaped pretty much everyone else in the room. Somehow, Leach’s conversational roulette wheel has landed on the subject of Roman emperors, and how there was a guy called a something-or-other whose job it was to stand behind the emperor, reminding him — and here I shall quote Leach directly, for the sake of historical accuracy — “how dangerous it was to take your eye off the thing, or whatever.”

Thank you, Michael Weinreb. You just gave an example of a word finding problem! 

Identifying Finding Difficulties – other test ideas

images-2

 

I talked last week about the Test of Word Finding and Test of Word Finding in Discourse.  What other standardized tests can give us clues about a child’s word retrieval, or word finding?

When I administer the CELF (Pearson), I make a note to myself in the margin of the test booklet when I hear what could be a word retrieval difficulty. That information doesn’t go into the official scoring, but when I see a lot of “WF” “WF” “WF” notes, I raise my eyebrows.  “Word Classes” and “Formulated Sentences” are subtests that seem particularly sensitive to word finding issues.  I was sad to see the CELF-5 eliminate the expressive portion of “Word Classes,” because I have found many children with word finding difficulties have trouble pulling up labels for categories (such as musical instruments, tools, transportation).

The Word Test (Linguisystems, now owned by Pro Ed) asks for synonyms, antonyms, definitions, and flexible word use. All that information is helpful.   The “semantic absurdities” subtest, however, is the one that seems to stump some word finders.  Their circumlocutions and revisions don’t affect their official scores.  But the path they take to formulate their answers is sometimes revealing.

I mentioned in a previous post that some SLPs watch for a discrepancy between receptive and expressive vocabulary.  I totally agree with that strategy; I just don’t think it should be the sole determiner to qualify a child for therapy. But certainly consider a  receptive/expressive discrepancy as important.

I am also intrigued by Elizabeth Carrow-Woolfolk’s new Test of Expressive Language, or TEXL.  I haven’t used it yet, have you?  Reading about the test makes me think it would also give some clues about a child’s word finding abilities.  If you have experience with this test that you can share with my readers, please post a comment. I would like your ideas!

 

 

 

Identifying Word Finding Difficulties, Part 2

My husband and I spent the weekend with our almost 8 month old granddaughter in Washington, DC, and her parents.  Such fun!!   Observing a young child’s emerging language skills is like watching a miracle unfold.  It was fun to watch the intricate communication between her and her parents, both verbal and nonverbal.  Word finding was not high on my priority list, but language development certainly was!

There’s nothing like a new city to bring out word finding difficulties in the best of us!  Think of Emancipation Proclamation, Smithsonian Institution, and National Mall.  Of course you know what those things are, but you might be hard pressed to retrieve the words quickly on demand.  Word retrieval is primarily impacted by (1) recency of use and (2) frequency of use.  So when we’re in a different environment and retrieving words we haven’t needed for a while, even typical language users sometimes have more difficulty.

imagesimages-1

The same thing happens with holiday vocabulary:  I explain to my students that even though they know what a wig, a skeleton, and a vampire are, they may need some hints to “refind” these words in their memories, because these words may have been tucked away since last Halloween.  Likewise, our students’ conversational speech may give us cues to their retrieval difficulties when we ask them to talk about topics they haven’t discussed recently.

This is good to remember when we are trying to elicit language samples.  We can learn a lot about a child’s articulation, vocabulary, and syntax by asking about a birthday party or his/her favorite sports team.  Those topics are not as likely to give us good information about word retrieval, however:   such topics may be highly rehearsed.   Instead, try asking about a movie they have seen or a book they are currently reading (“Oooh, what happened to Olaf?  Why?” or “What do you think will happen next?” ).  The trick is to get them to formulate some language they haven’t practiced recently.   Remember that a word retrieval difficulty is NOT the same as a vocabulary deficit:  I am talking about efficiently retrieving (“finding”) a word that is already in their receptive vocabulary. Try to avoid highly rehearsed or highly ritualized conversations.

What else affects retrieval?  Word finding is definitely impacted by stress.  Even hormones may play a role. And we all know that retrieval becomes more difficult as adults age (sigh).  This weekend was a reminder that when we are very tired (think young parents with a new baby) we may not retrieve words as readily as at other times.  Everyone experiences word finding difficulties sometimes. When we are identifying children with word finding challenges, we are looking for patterns.   We are watching for those red flags that make us wonder why they are having expressive language problems that aren’t explained by a vocabulary, syntax, or social language deficit (or temporary sleep deprivation).  Some “word finders” are very slow to come up with specific words, yet others name items very quickly but have to correct themselves.  And don’t forget to watch for those nonverbal secondary behaviors such as looking up to the ceiling, snapping fingers, or hitting one’s thigh with a clenched fist.  All these are clues that a child may benefit from word finding intervention.   Look beyond the standardized test scores:  Use your professional instincts.  Is the child frustrated in his or her attempts to explain a sequence of events clearly?  Is his classroom performance impacted?  Is his budding social life impacted?  Does he raise his hand to volunteer, only to say, “I forgot” or “nevermind”?

Again, on my references and materials page, I have posted observation checklists for both classroom teachers and for parents.  Those checklists provide some additional examples of behaviors to watch for.  Keep your eyes and ears open.   In my next post, I’ll suggest some  standardized tests that can provide more clues to identifying word finding, or word retrieval, difficulties.

 

 

 

Identifying Word Finding Difficulties

Hooray! The TWF-3 is now available! In my first post, I mentioned that I was postponing discussing “identification” of children with word finding difficulties until I had discussed “awareness.” The 3rd edition of the Test of Word Finding, by Dr. Diane German, is now available (published by Pro Ed; see below), and now is a good time to discuss how to identify children who need word finding intervention. I have to disclose that I have not yet administered the TWF-3; my experience up to this point has been with the TWF-2.

The TWF-3 is a valid and reliable test to identify children who experience word finding difficulties when naming individual words. The TWF-2 has definitely been my instrument of choice to administer when I suspect word retrieval difficulties. I can’t wait to use the TWF-3! Some SLPs also look at the discrepancy between receptive and expressive vocabulary scores. This can be tricky – you may not be actually comparing comprehension and retrieval of the same words.

In addition to the Word Finding Index derived from the Test of Word Finding, I think it is important to look at the informal information the test provides:

Phonemic Cueing: Is the child able to provide the correct response when you  provide the beginning sound or syllable? If so, he almost certainly has the               item in his lexicon. This is a big red flag telling you “I know that word, I just couldn’t get it out!” I frequently include a narrative in my evaluation                           reports describing the number of words that a child named correctly once he was provided with a cue.

Imitation: Is he able to repeat multi-syllable words once he hears you model  them? This is an easy way to distinguish children with retrieval                                     problems from children with motor-planning problems.

Delayed Response Procedure: How many words were correct, but delayed?  Some kids name words quickly, but make errors and self-corrections.  Others             are frequently very slow.

Secondary Characteristics Tally: What facial expressions or body language did the the child display that suggested he was having difficulty coming up                   with a  word? Did he look up to the ceiling? Did he make a fist and pound his thigh to get the word out? A perceptive SLP notices the differences                              between a child “stuck” retrieving a word vs. a disfluent child who is displaying secondary characteristics associated with stuttering.

 

All of these informal analyses can be applied to the child’s spontaneous speech. Listen to his or her expressive language. What do you hear and see when he is describing his visit to the library or his experience during his last soccer game? Does he seem frustrated trying to convey his experiences?  Does he use a lot of vague words (guys, stuff, things)? It is extremely important to remember that there are some children who experience word retrieval difficulties in their connected speech even if they don’t experience difficulties naming individual items. Please don’t discount “word finding” as an area of difficulty based on a child’s TWF score alone.

We can look at a child’s word finding in a more “connected speech” context by using The Test of Word Finding in Discourse. This test, also published by Pro Ed, is quick to administer but very time-consuming to analyze. I tend to use the non-standardized procedures described in the manual, and look at the child’s delays, self-corrections, and substitutions compared to typical children. To be honest, a busy school-based SLP has a difficult time spending the time required to transcribe and analyze the connected speech samples the TWF in Discourse requires.

I have found I get a great deal of information in a shorter time by using 2 observation checklists I developed. My starting point was Dr. German’s “Word Finding Referral Checklist,” published in 1993 by Word Finding Materials, Inc.. I adapted some items from the checklist, and tried to quantify responses by asking teachers and parents to label behaviors as occurring “often,” “sometimes,” or “rarely or never.”   I have kept data for several years, and am finding that the responses correlate fairly well with TWF-2 scores. They also identify some children who are experiencing word finding in their spontaneous speech (word finding in “discourse”) even if they are able to name individual words efficiently.

Maybe a more practical use of these checklists is AWARENESS. I have encountered parents who were totally unaware of their child’s word finding difficulties come to IEP meetings and say, “It never occurred to me that these things could be due to ‘word finding’”. I’ve also had teachers come back to me with the checklist and say, “these behaviors describe my student exactly.”   I feel like they open up a discussion about what the child is experiencing when he has trouble expressing himself. It is especially interesting to see how a teacher’s observations correlates (or doesn’t correlate) with a parent’s.

I have posted the “Classroom Teacher’s Observations of Word Finding Behaviors” and the “Parent’s Observations of Word Finding Behaviors” in the materials/resources page of this blog. Please feel free to use them. I would very much like your data if you do choose to use them. Eventually, I would love to develop norms for the responses. Let me know if you find them to be helpful.

Sources:

German, D. J. (2015). Test of Word Finding, Third Edition  (TWF-3). Austin, Texas: Pro-ed.

Observation checklists adapted from German, D.J. & German, A. E. (1993) Word Finding Referral Checklist (WFRC), Long Grove, IL: Word Finding Materials, Inc.