Tag Archives: expressive language

Semantic or Phonological Intervention??

Photo from pixy.org

I was very excited to see an article about word finding in children reviewed in The Informed SLP’s February 27 newsletter.* “Understanding differing outcomes from semantic and phonological interventions with children with word-finding difficulties: A group and case series study,” written by Best, W., Hughes, I., Masterson, J., Thomas, M., S. C., Howard, D., Kapikian,A., & Shobbrook, K.(2021). The reviewer, Mollee Sultani, provided an excellent summary of the research, and I encourage you to read it. The entire article appeared in the February, 2021 issue of the scientific journal Cortex.

The researchers addressed a question I have asked myself many times as I work with children: which intervention is most effective? The study compared the use of semantic word webs with the use of phonological word webs. This carefully designed, randomized control trial looked at 20 children aged 6 to 8 in a mainstream school. All the children were presented with both types of treatment.

Two rounds of treatment were presented. One asked the children to complete phonological word webs (e.g., “What does it rhyme with? What sound does it start with?”), the other asked the children to complete semantic word webs (“What does it look like? What do you do with it?”). Among treated words, the semantic intervention resulted in a gain of almost twice as many items as the phonological intervention. However, a closer look at individual children showed that children who had difficulty with either semantic or phonological abilities gained the most from the intervention that matched their area of weakness. In other words, the children with semantic weakness gained most from semantic word webs. The children with phonological weakness gained most from phonological word webs. The most effective intervention depended on the child’s own language profile.

An important point made in the conclusion of the Cortex article stated that “the approach involves encouraging active participation so that children produce or choose features of words and in later sessions reflect on what helps them retrieve words.” The authors noted that the children didn’t generalize their skills to words that had not been included in the treatment. That makes our choice of words presented in therapy even more important. We need to choose words that are meaningful to the individual – either academically or personally. I look forward to more research informing SLPs of best practice.

Sources:

“Understanding differing outcomes from semantic and phonological interventions with children with word-finding difficulties: A group and case series study,” written by Best, W., Hughes, I., Masterson, J., Thomas, M., S. C., Howard, D., Kapikian,A., & Shobbrook, K.(2021). Cortex, 2021

*The Informed SLP newsletter, available at TheInformedSLP.com, February 27, 2021, published by Dr. Meredith Poore Harold, PhD, CCC-SLP. Cortex article reviewed by Mollee Sultani, CCC-SLP.

A “shapely” review

I regularly remind my students and my readers that retrieval is impacted by frequency of use and recency of use. So why would it surprise me that my client had difficulty retrieving the names of common shapes? While completing an oral directions activity, I noticed that she was misnaming square, rectangle, and triangle. Receptively, she was firm in her understanding. A year ago, these words were easy for her to retrieve.

I put together a “cheat sheet” for these 3 shapes. A picture of a “tricycle,” with a triangle drawn among its 3 wheels was the visual cue for “triangle.” a rectangular “wreck” served as a cue for “rectangle,” and a woman with “square hair” was the cue for “square.” I reminded this little girl about the syllables in each word and asked her to clap out syllable by syllable. After making the syllables explicit, I connected cues with the real word. I then had her “think the cue, but say the word” 5 times aloud. Finally, she had to make up a meaningful, grammatical sentence using the word. *

Success! I had forgotten one of my basic tenets: Don’t forget that frequency of use and recency of use strongly affect retrieval speed and accuracy. Those vocab words that were easy a year ago may not be easy to retrieve today.

*For a more detailed explanation of the process, please refer to “An Endorsement from the Word Finding Guru” at this link: https://www.wordfindingforkids.com/an-endorsement-from-the-word-finding-guru/ Reference: Dr. Diane German

New expressions to learn

The Coronavirus has given us a new lexicon.

We are all using words and expressions we weren’t familiar with a very short time ago. Coronavirus, Covid-19, self-quarantine, vector, shelter-in-place, social distancing: were you using these terms a month ago? Suddenly we have a new reality…and new language to accompany it. Most of our kids are being schooled via e-learning and spring break vacations are no longer being considered.

Have you had difficulty retrieving any of these words? Remember that frequency of use and recency of use are the most important factors that determine ease of retrieval. I would imagine none of us need a word finding cue for “Corona.” (Although some people were mistakenly making an association with the Mexican beer) Sadly enough, that word is now right on the tips of our tongues. But as we discuss prevention, symptoms, and treatment with our socially-distanced friends and family, we sometimes find ourselves having difficulty coming up with some of these expressions.

Quarantine: how about the phonemic cue “foreign”? I don’t mean a xenophobic reference to another country, I mean a foreign body making us ill. If we self-quarantine, that foreign body may pass us by.

Vector: Ah, heck, that population is a vector for the disease.

Covid-19: Take Cover

Unfortunately, there will be new words to come. Please share your word finding cues for the new reality in which we are living.

Helping preschoolers with word finding difficulties

school-readiness-for-preschool

Preschoolers with word retrieval difficulties are tricky.  We need to be sure theirs is not a deficit in vocabulary or a phonological disorder that makes them difficult to understand.  Sometimes I have worked with preschoolers in language therapy for a while before I realized their underlying difficulty was actually word finding.

Please read my posts of October 14, 20 and 21, 2014, about identifying word retrieval problems.  Some preschoolers do not respond well to formal testing, and it’s very important to look at their use of language in a natural environment.  One of the most helpful strategies for preschoolers is to offer a choice of 3 or 4 responses and ask them to choose the correct one:  “Are you telling me about your elbow, your shoulder, or your ankle?” or “Would you like the purple, the orange, or the yellow marker?”

Remember that a failure to respond does not necessarily mean the child does not know the answer.  Give him extra time, and provide advance warning if possible.   “I’ll ask you to tell me what your favorite project was yesterday.  You can share about making a snowman, drawing a caterpillar, or sharing a snack.  Be thinking about what you’d like to tell your friends.”

Encourage gestures and actions.

“Can you tell me another way?”

Establish a signal or a key phrase for the child to let you know he needs some more “thinking time.”

For some children, providing the beginning sound (not beginning letter) is helpful.  This is generally more helpful with older children, but some preschoolers are aided by this prompt.  I suspect it is related to their phonological development, but I truly don’t know.

Any activities you are currently using for language development are helpful for kids with word finding problems.  Develop vocabulary, categories, and associations among different words.  Expand their “safety net” of a rich language base. Most important, have fun!  A happy, engaged child is ready to learn.

 

 

 

An endorsement from the word finding guru!

I met today with Dr. Diane German, who has been my mentor in the field of word finding ever since I took her course on the subject.  I call her the word finding guru.  I showed her this blog, my Facebook page, and my Twitter tweets.  She was very enthusiastic about more SLPs, teachers, and parents becoming informed about the impact word finding can have on kids, and how we can help them.   I think that’s one thing that is very special about the field of speech-language pathology – people are always networking to share ideas and best practices.

Meeting with Diane was a reminder we want to help a child get automatic with important vocabulary before he or she needs the words in conversational speech. So now is the time to introduce the Thanksgiving vocabulary and corresponding retrieval strategies needed  so he can comfortably discuss his or her upcoming Thanksgiving activities. Dr. German (2005) in the Word Finding Intervention Program, Second Edition (WFIP-2) presents a 5-step retrieval procedure for improving word finding of target words.

First, select a word that is difficult for the  learner to retrieve.

Second, divide the target word into syllables, reinforcing each syllable of multi-syllable words.   When I do this second step,  I like to have the younger kids move their entire bodies with each syllable.  I borrowed Dr. Judy Montgomery’s technique of “head, shoulders, knees, and toes” which she uses to promote syllable awareness for beginning readers (Montgomery, 2007).  I have the kids stand up, touch their “head, shoulders, knees, and toes” for each syllable in  (e.g.,) cornucopia, Mayflower, or Pilgrim. The kids are always begging for words of 5 or more syllables so they can swat their own rear end!  You can also have them  touch shoulder, elbow, wrist, tap out syllables, clap, or even stomp their feet.  I have had third grade girls act out an impromptu rap dance to reinforce the syllables in “quadrilateral.”   Get them moving and laughing!  Reinforce each syllable with a movement.

Third, according to Dr. German, match same sound mnemonic cues  (words that sound like the target syllable) to the “evasive” (i.e., difficult to retrieve) syllables.  This helps anchor the syllables for automatic retrieval.   Here are some ideas to get you started:

cornucopia – corn/coke or corn/Cody (apparently there is a popular Disney channel show about Zack and Cody)

Pilgrim – pill/grim or pill/Grinch –  draw a picture with a grim-faced Pilgrim wearing a pill for a hat or the Grinch with a pill

feast –  feet – draw a picture of a big platter of feet to eat

The sillier the better. The kids are engaged and start coming up with their own cues.  Remember that what is meaningful to you as an adult may not be meaningful to an eight year old or a junior in high school.  Be alert to the popular culture with which they are familiar.  I confess that I had never heard of Zack and Cody, but my speech kids certainly knew who they were!   Dr. German stresses that it is important to think of the cue as you practice saying the target word out loud.  She recommends mnemonic cues be written in a “think cloud” to reinforce that one only thinks of the mnemonic cues.

Lastly, steps 4 and 5 involve rehearsal. While the learner thinks of his/her mnemonic cues, each target word is rehearsed three times alone and then in a meaningful sentence (German, 2005). When I do these last steps with my students, I modify a bit:  I  ask for a “word finding 5.”  Each student says the word aloud 5 times, makes up a sentence using the word, then he or she gets a “high 5.”

Try to anticipate the vocabulary your students will need in the coming weeks.  Recheck with your classroom teachers and get an update on their curriculum words.  Don’t forget to share your ideas for mnemonic cues by replying to this post or by emailing me: jan@wordfindingforkids.com. I will add your ideas to the vocabulary list on this blog.

References

German, D.J. (2005). Word Finding Intervention Program, Second Edition (WFIP-2), Austin,TX: Pro.ed.

Montgomery, J. K. (2007b). The Bridge of Vocabulary. Minneapolis, MN: Pearson Assessment.

 

 

Strategies for word retrieval

I mentioned last week that phonological mnemonics are powerful aids for word finding.  Pairing “easy words” with “hard words” has been shown to promote word retrieval [source: German, D. J., Schwanke, J. K., & Ravid, R. (2012). Word Finding: Differentiated vocabulary instruction in the speech and language room. Communications Disorders Quarterly, 33(3), 146-156].  You can refer to the drop down vocabulary menu from the blue bar at the top of this page for a list of cues I have used or others have suggested to me.

When you can anticipate the vocabulary a child needs, the mnemonics are my strategy of choice.   But what about those times a child gets stuck on a word he hasn’t practiced?

Screen Shot 2014-11-01 at 2.06.37 PM

A child needs a variety of strategies to help himself come up with target words.  It’s important to match the strategy to his/her individual needs.  I try to watch for those times a child encounters a word finding problem during a therapy session.  As soon as possible, I ask him to tell me how he came up with the target word.  “How did you get there?”  Did he visualize the context of the word he needed? For example, if he was trying to come up with the word “touchdown” did he visualize a football game?  If she was trying to come up with the word “pommel horse” did she visualize her gymnastics studio?  Did he remember the initial sound in the word?  Did she remember the category to which the word belonged?

In my next few posts, I’ll talk about the different strategies I have found successful.  I have used 2 acronyms for these strategies:  The first is FAVOR-C (“Do yourself a favor and see these word finding strategies in your mind”).

F  Fill in the blank

A  Associations

V  Visualize

O   Opposites and synonyms

R   Reflective pause

C   Categories

The second is “Silly Sally Always Draws Fuzzy Pandas.”  Thanks to my colleagues Sarah Mendoza and Tara Brooks Baron for coming up with this cute acronym:

Screen Shot 2014-11-01 at 2.06.37 PM

You will notice the strategies aren’t the same on both lists. You may want to make modifications of your own. Think about  what strategies  the child finds most helpful.  Obviously older kids may be more comfortable with FAVOR-C; younger ones may like “Silly Sally.”  I’ll give some examples of activities I have used with each of these strategies in future posts.

 

More word retrieval in the media..hot off the press!

Word retrieval in the media!! From ESPN today, October 29 – Grantland.com gave a perfect example of a word finding difficulty you can share with your young (or old) sports fans:

The Pirate and His Pupil

After butting heads for two seasons, Mike Leach and Connor Halliday have finally found common ground — and air. Now, the passing records are starting to fall.

There’s a word that Mike Leach is trying to conjure from somewhere deep within the bedraggled utility closet of his mind, and this word is escaping him, just as the context of this particular digression has escaped pretty much everyone else in the room. Somehow, Leach’s conversational roulette wheel has landed on the subject of Roman emperors, and how there was a guy called a something-or-other whose job it was to stand behind the emperor, reminding him — and here I shall quote Leach directly, for the sake of historical accuracy — “how dangerous it was to take your eye off the thing, or whatever.”

Thank you, Michael Weinreb. You just gave an example of a word finding problem! 

Identifying Finding Difficulties – other test ideas

images-2

 

I talked last week about the Test of Word Finding and Test of Word Finding in Discourse.  What other standardized tests can give us clues about a child’s word retrieval, or word finding?

When I administer the CELF (Pearson), I make a note to myself in the margin of the test booklet when I hear what could be a word retrieval difficulty. That information doesn’t go into the official scoring, but when I see a lot of “WF” “WF” “WF” notes, I raise my eyebrows.  “Word Classes” and “Formulated Sentences” are subtests that seem particularly sensitive to word finding issues.  I was sad to see the CELF-5 eliminate the expressive portion of “Word Classes,” because I have found many children with word finding difficulties have trouble pulling up labels for categories (such as musical instruments, tools, transportation).

The Word Test (Linguisystems, now owned by Pro Ed) asks for synonyms, antonyms, definitions, and flexible word use. All that information is helpful.   The “semantic absurdities” subtest, however, is the one that seems to stump some word finders.  Their circumlocutions and revisions don’t affect their official scores.  But the path they take to formulate their answers is sometimes revealing.

I mentioned in a previous post that some SLPs watch for a discrepancy between receptive and expressive vocabulary.  I totally agree with that strategy; I just don’t think it should be the sole determiner to qualify a child for therapy. But certainly consider a  receptive/expressive discrepancy as important.

I am also intrigued by Elizabeth Carrow-Woolfolk’s new Test of Expressive Language, or TEXL.  I haven’t used it yet, have you?  Reading about the test makes me think it would also give some clues about a child’s word finding abilities.  If you have experience with this test that you can share with my readers, please post a comment. I would like your ideas!

 

 

 

Identifying Word Finding Difficulties, Part 2

My husband and I spent the weekend with our almost 8 month old granddaughter in Washington, DC, and her parents.  Such fun!!   Observing a young child’s emerging language skills is like watching a miracle unfold.  It was fun to watch the intricate communication between her and her parents, both verbal and nonverbal.  Word finding was not high on my priority list, but language development certainly was!

There’s nothing like a new city to bring out word finding difficulties in the best of us!  Think of Emancipation Proclamation, Smithsonian Institution, and National Mall.  Of course you know what those things are, but you might be hard pressed to retrieve the words quickly on demand.  Word retrieval is primarily impacted by (1) recency of use and (2) frequency of use.  So when we’re in a different environment and retrieving words we haven’t needed for a while, even typical language users sometimes have more difficulty.

imagesimages-1

The same thing happens with holiday vocabulary:  I explain to my students that even though they know what a wig, a skeleton, and a vampire are, they may need some hints to “refind” these words in their memories, because these words may have been tucked away since last Halloween.  Likewise, our students’ conversational speech may give us cues to their retrieval difficulties when we ask them to talk about topics they haven’t discussed recently.

This is good to remember when we are trying to elicit language samples.  We can learn a lot about a child’s articulation, vocabulary, and syntax by asking about a birthday party or his/her favorite sports team.  Those topics are not as likely to give us good information about word retrieval, however:   such topics may be highly rehearsed.   Instead, try asking about a movie they have seen or a book they are currently reading (“Oooh, what happened to Olaf?  Why?” or “What do you think will happen next?” ).  The trick is to get them to formulate some language they haven’t practiced recently.   Remember that a word retrieval difficulty is NOT the same as a vocabulary deficit:  I am talking about efficiently retrieving (“finding”) a word that is already in their receptive vocabulary. Try to avoid highly rehearsed or highly ritualized conversations.

What else affects retrieval?  Word finding is definitely impacted by stress.  Even hormones may play a role. And we all know that retrieval becomes more difficult as adults age (sigh).  This weekend was a reminder that when we are very tired (think young parents with a new baby) we may not retrieve words as readily as at other times.  Everyone experiences word finding difficulties sometimes. When we are identifying children with word finding challenges, we are looking for patterns.   We are watching for those red flags that make us wonder why they are having expressive language problems that aren’t explained by a vocabulary, syntax, or social language deficit (or temporary sleep deprivation).  Some “word finders” are very slow to come up with specific words, yet others name items very quickly but have to correct themselves.  And don’t forget to watch for those nonverbal secondary behaviors such as looking up to the ceiling, snapping fingers, or hitting one’s thigh with a clenched fist.  All these are clues that a child may benefit from word finding intervention.   Look beyond the standardized test scores:  Use your professional instincts.  Is the child frustrated in his or her attempts to explain a sequence of events clearly?  Is his classroom performance impacted?  Is his budding social life impacted?  Does he raise his hand to volunteer, only to say, “I forgot” or “nevermind”?

Again, on my references and materials page, I have posted observation checklists for both classroom teachers and for parents.  Those checklists provide some additional examples of behaviors to watch for.  Keep your eyes and ears open.   In my next post, I’ll suggest some  standardized tests that can provide more clues to identifying word finding, or word retrieval, difficulties.